Compare

Sales Automation comparison

Clay vs LeadMagic

Clay is best when you need a flexible GTM workbench and have someone accountable for data quality. LeadMagic is best for technical teams that want one shared credit pool across email, mobile, company, and signal endpoints. The decision comes down to which operating model fits the team.

Shortlist size

2

Reviewed options, connected to full verdicts and current pricing notes.

The shortlist

Start with fit, then price.

How reviews are scored
Pick 18.1/10
Clay logo

Sales Automation

Clay

Best when you need a flexible GTM workbench and have someone accountable for data quality.

From
$167/mo
Setup
Advanced

Best for

GTM engineers

Read Clay review
Pick 28/10
LeadMagic logo

Sales Automation

LeadMagic

Best for technical teams that want one shared credit pool across email, mobile, company, and signal endpoints.

From
$49/mo
Setup
Advanced

Best for

Technical GTM teams

Read LeadMagic review

Buying criteria

What makes the cut.

The shortlist is intentionally smaller than the market. A tool belongs here only when its reviewed workflow overlaps the decision on this page.

  1. 1

    Features

    Compare the capability that changes the workflow, not the longest feature list.

  2. 2

    Pricing

    Normalize billing cadence, seats, credits, and add-ons before comparing starting prices.

  3. 3

    Best fit

    Use setup burden, team size, and the main watchout to break a close score.

Side-by-side

The decision table.

ToolScoreStarting priceBest fitWatchout
Clay8.1/10$167/moGTM engineersActions/Data Credits can get expensive
LeadMagic8/10$49/moTechnical GTM teamsRequires endpoint planning